“Learning without thinking is labor lost; Thinking without learning is perilous,” said Confucius.
The basic objective of a classroom is to enable, empower and educate the learner to think meaningfully and constructively on the subject matter one is dealing with. Unfortunately, the last few decades have ushered in an educational system, where the faculty of thinking is marginalized to deal with the quantum of data and information more for their repetitive use. In pursuit of this objective, the content of the curriculum and its related pedagogy are articulated to serve the secondary or tertiary purposes and objectives of an educational process. This is further scaffolded by an assessment system which evaluates recapitulation and reproduction of facts. It gives little scope for assessment of the higher faculties of a functional brain. The need for a thinking classroom has often been reiterated in educational policies repeatedly with no meaningful follow up actions. The overload of the content in the curricula further inhibits the opportunities for a thinking classroom with teachers often complaining inadequacy of time and resources for their own preparation or administering the relevant pedagogical strategies in the classroom,
A Research study using neuroimaging by Southern California ‘s Laboratory estimated that the average person has around seventy thousand discreet thoughts per day. With abundant thoughts pouring in from various sources as inputs, the human mind has a continuous flow of traffic requiring us to deal with each of them to the extent they deserve attention. However, how many of these thoughts result into action, become productive and engaging, and how many of them manifest and emerge to a desirable quality, is indeed a matter of further research. It is in this context, the deliberations of a classroom gain relevance and importance to develop a culture of thinking which enhances purpose, focus, quality, and productivity.
A classroom should therefore have features that not only promote thinking, but also the quality of thinking. The argument by a few that the design of the curriculum, its end objectives, the assessment patterns inhibit such exercises is not adequately convincing. A well-prepared teacher designs and incorporates elements and strategies that would help learners to think effectively and constructively.
Here are some of the features of a thinking classroom:
1. Fear free environment
A classroom that encourages thinking should be founded in a fear-free environment. Oftentimes, the learners who have developed fear for the teacher, fear for the learning environment, fear of peer impressions, fear for authority and the like, flee from opportunities for thinking.
They tend to hide into their own conceptual shells and hibernate for extended periods with questions of ‘do’s- and don’ts.” They tend to stick to the routine practices and want to live in ‘comfort zones’ which are protective and avoid issues relating to risks of being mistaken or misinterpreted. Even when opportunities knock at their door for healthy and vibrant thinking, they keep away to avoid futuristic risks. Teachers would do well to identify such students and engage with them with a positive intent to facilitate them to be participants in active learning and helping them to diffuse their misconceptions.
2. Stress free pedagogy.
Apart from fear, there are several other concerns that cause stress to the learners in the classroom. They may be due to socio-cultural factors, poor financial infrastructures from which they come, language related issues, health concerns and other types of learning stress.
Often these types of stress result in poor communication, withdrawal from frontline performances, thus inhibiting them from being actively engaged in free thinking or in questioning for further learning. Students belonging to this category tend to exhibit neurosis, low self-esteem, and self-pity. All that the teachers could do is to help them to break these barriers with a mature attitude that helps them to move ahead with their thinking hats. Many of these students have latent talents to question, evaluate and re-engineer their knowledge. Adequate steps need to be taken by the teachers to design their classroom pedagogy to empower thinking.
3 Freedom to question
“A prudent question is one half of wisdom” said Sir Francis Bacon.
The ability to question is both directly and indirectly suggestive of the fact that the person who asks the question is indeed thinking. Even if the question is not really focused, even if it could solicit multiple answers or relate to different perceptions, it does serve the objective of expressing a concern, a doubt, a misgiving, an underlying issue or the inadequacy or incompleteness of a concept under consideration. In some of the routine classrooms, the teachers feel challenged when a learner raises a question. The teacher’s inability either to give a perfect meaningful reply or their lack of awareness about the issue raised in the question forces them to silence the learner. In a few cases teachers tend to silence the questioning child through psychologically demotivating statements.
However, a good classroom is a place where questions are encouraged, entertained and attempts are made to seek answers either directly or through collective deliberations.
4. Opening opportunities for thinking pathways.
It is said that the human brain has a fascination for pattern making. It tends to fall into a pattern often as a preferred choice. However, the brain is also blessed with the capacity of creating, using, and working with multiple pathways about the same subject of study. The power of ‘synesthesia’ of the human brain provides a far-reaching opportunity to play with knowledge. Following different pathways of thinking leads to multiple styles of thinking – lateral, analytical, parallel and others.
In a classroom where children breathe adequate freedom, the mind opens to multiple considerations about the ideas, themes or concepts and develops a contextual unique strategy within a few seconds. This requires a strategic decision-making methodology. Pursuits of multiple pathways of thinking helps the learner to choose the best option unique to the self.
The classroom should provide formal and informal opportunities for the same and help the learner to express one’s own thoughts and ideas, without any reservation or suppression.
5. Encouraging Disruptive Thinking
“A mind that is full of conclusions is a dead mind, it is not a living mind. A living mind is a free mind, learning, never concluding “, says J. Krishnamurti, the internationally celebrated scholar.
Disruptive thinking is an expression of an active, engaging, and conscious mind. Disruptive thinking often questions the credibility and validity of existing thoughts and ideas. It challenges linearity or selectivity in thinking. It paves way for creative thinking through critical appreciation of the existing structures and processes. Often disruptive thinking is considered as a violation of established norms or disciplines; and hence learners who think disruptively are treated with contempt until the reality pops out.
A thinking classroom should indeed welcome disruptive thoughts so that the foundations of existing thought architectures could be re-examined with a third eye.
6. Encouraging critical appreciation
Critical review and critical appreciation of ideas, thoughts, concepts, perceptions, practices, and procedures is vital to a thinking classroom. Giving space and opportunity for them will help learners to celebrate their self-esteem without any inhibition. Further it could catalyze them to come forth with dynamic and powerful suggestions for critical analysis which could lead to creative enterprises. In normal classrooms, teachers tend to see some of these actions as counter-productive, non-linear and derailment of the purpose and focus of their journey towards completion of the curriculum. One of the reasons for such attitudes is consideration of learning as a scheduled journey from one destination to another rejecting the joy of learning. Zone of proximal development in cognitive exercises is marginalized in achieving some set goals for learning. This needs redressal.
Thinking classrooms are vibrant platforms for participative learning through collaborative and constructivist approaches and to celebrate ‘self-learning’ and ‘self-directed learning.’ The National Education policy 2020 encourages the schools to make their classrooms “Thinking Classrooms”.
References
- National Education Policy 2020 – Government of India
- The Tell-Tale Brain – Dr. V.S. Ramachandra
- Lateral Thinking – Edward De Bono
- Mindscaping Education -G Balasubramanian
- Brain Rules – Dr. John Medina
 Dr G Balasubramnian | G. Balasubramanian was born at Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu on 17th February, 1946. He had his initial schooling at Madurai and graduated in Chemistry from Presidency college, Chennai. He obtained a Post-graduation in Analytical & Inorganic Chemistry from Madras University, Post-graduation in Hindi from Sri Venkateswara University and Post-graduation in Education from Annamalai University. |
He obtained a Diploma in German from University of Madras, a Certificate in Project Technology from Trent College of Education, Nottingham U.K and a Certificate in Computer Education from Leeds University, U.K
Starting his career as a Post-graduate Teacher in Chemistry in a public school, he took over as a Principal of Hindu Senior secondary School, Triplicane, Chennai. He joined the Central Board of Secondary Education as a Joint Secretary in 1984 and has worked in several capacities in Academics, Examination, Confidential and Administration branches of CBSE.
Elevated to the Post of Director (Academic) in 1997, he held the additional charge of the Chief Vigilance Officer of the Board. He retired from the services of the Board on 28th Feb, 2006.
He was associated with several Boards of education and leading organizations like Quality Council of India, NABET, National Institute of Open Schooling, Global Indian international Schools in Singapore, Malaysia and Japan. He is the current chairperson of the international council for school leadership. He was the Chief Editor of the magazines – ‘The Progressive School’ and ‘The Progressive Teacher’ published by S. Chand group of companies. He is currently Advisor to the following companies – “Knowledge Tribe” and “Teacher Tribe” at Bengaluru.
His interests include philosophy, psychology, poetry and Literature. He has widely traveled to many countries and participated in several national and international conferences and presented papers on a wide variety of academic interests. Post retirement he has conducted over 7000 training programs for teachers and Principals covering over 85000 teachers.
His publications are:
- Mindscaping Education
- Case Studies in classrooms
- Quality Spectrum – A school’s Bandwidth
- Safety in schools – Issues and concerns
- Academic Leadership – ebook
- Schooling the kid – learning form K to 12
- Creativity in classrooms – eBook
- Unlearning Learning – eBook
- A Happy Journey (Poetry)
- Apologies to an Existence (Poetry)
His latest book “Walk with Viswa”- a journey to Leadership along the Farmlands is due for publication.
Awards won:
- Vocational Excellence Award from Rotary Club, Chennai
- Seva Rathna in Education from The Centenarian Trust, Chennai
- Lifetime Achievement Award from VIMHANS (Vidyasagar Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences) Delhi
He has been a member of the High-Power committee constituted by the Government of Tamilnadu for School Education and has also been the chairperson of the Curriculum Reforms Committee and the Examination Reforms Committee for School Education in the Government of Tamilnadu.
If you would like to get connected to Dr G Balasubramanian write to editor@acadnews.com.
